
I,
perhaps foolishly, make two conclusions for Lewis would tell us. If Lewis were
asked to speak today, I'm sure he’d repeat the contention that scientific materialism
provides an argument for many against faith. Put simply, many atheists use
science to argue that all there is the material world. Lewis replied that
materialism is self-defeating, and that we need to look beyond this world, and
that such a life brings incredible joy. As he intoned over the airwaves of the
BBC in the early ‘40s, “If I find in
myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most
probable explanation is that I was made for another world.” This
is how he leads us to resolve the crisis of atheism—that it does not satisfy. Of
course, this might evoke the ire of “New Atheists,” old atheists, or
those who like reading them. But it might also lead those who find that
atheism, old or new, has brought them to a crisis of dissatisfaction to a new
resolution.
Now to my second assertion: if Time magazine was right to call him today’s
“hottest theologian,” what else does Lewis say to us today? Lewis would tell us
we have to engage the imagination, not simply our reasoning. If anything, this
is what cognitive science tells us—we hardly ever rationally reflect without
also simultaneously feeling. And culturally, this is particularly important. Consider
this: What are the influencing factors in our country? What I see are these
grand stories that we read in novels and watch in movies. (Super heroes will be
with us forever.) St. Clive was more than willing to engage imagination with
the truth of Christian life. I could put it this way: if we imagine that imagine
that God exists, what would the world? That's what Lewis is fiction and even
just analogies he peppered throughout his writings did. What would Lewis say
today? With fourth Chronicles of Narnia in
production, maybe St. Clive is still speaking…
2 comments:
Hey Greg. Love the essay. I figured you would appreciate me pointing out that there are a few proof reading edits that ought to be made. Two in the first half of the first paragraph and one or two in the last half of the last paragraph. If you would like me to be specific just let me know. My phone is always on. Michael Nevens
Thanks for the comments, and I'll check out those spots!
Post a Comment