Why care what C. S. Lewis had to say about science, a topic
that his filled the past few posts? In one sense, this theme could seem to
border of the trivial. Lewis—though a renowned scholar in his field of Medieval
and Renaissance literature—had no particular insight into scientific
discoveries. His inability to grasp mathematics, which almost caused him not to
be accepted at Oxford—is well-known. We might decide the subject has little to
offer and move on.
For
today, I have only two notes: This demonstrates that it isn’t often science
qua science that determines its effects on culture. It’s more often the
worldview that emerges. It also tells us something about 2014. Does this “birth
of the machine” lead us to Ray Kurzweil and transhumanism, particularly the
idea that we will achieve a technological singularity in which artificial intelligence
can upload an entire human brain/mind into an immensely powerful computer? I
suppose I wouldn’t be the first to note that once we make human beings a machine,
it’s not a far leap that they become infinitely improvable and therefore
upload-able.
1 comment:
The world view that "old is inferior to the new" is pervasive in our culture. A smartphone is obsolete after a year. Kitchen decor is dated in 10. A human being is useless after 60 (in Silicon Valley, 30). Without a sacred view of humanity ( imago dei), humans are discarded when the novelty wears off.
Post a Comment