tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20905577.post116974752333043892..comments2024-02-22T04:58:19.083-08:00Comments on My Reflections: Probability and GodUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20905577.post-64834088426135862142007-05-02T20:46:00.000-07:002007-05-02T20:46:00.000-07:00I could be wrong, but I don't think Dawkins would ...I could be wrong, but I don't think Dawkins would care about the Anthropic Principle. it's untestable and, therefore, not scientific. <BR/><BR/>I'm not sure I care whether or not god is 'probable'...i may even agree that the existence of 'god' is improbable. Does that change what I believe and how I go about attempting to understand the mystery of this existence? I don't believe so. Why should it? It still doesn't answer the questions of this existence.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14636712951406950579noreply@blogger.com